Wednesday, October 1, 2008

The Streets Of San Francisco




Linda Harvey went to San Francisco to see first hand what the Homosexuals are up to. Read her review.

The Streets of San Francisco, Part 2:
Folsom Street Fair Seeks to Normalize Public Nudity and Sex Violence

by Linda Harvey

WARNING: GRAPHIC CONTENT
The need
to pass California’s Proposition 8, upholding marriage between one man and one
woman, has never been greater in my view after spending an afternoon at the San
Francisco Folsom Street Fair on September 28.With well over 100,000 attendees,
it’s unfortunately the third largest street event in California.

Folsom Street displayed the fully ripened rotten fruit of ‘tolerance’ and
showed where it takes us: toward public nudity, public sex and consensual sex
violence. The goal of same sex ‘marriage’ is the legitimate-appearing sister
with an ugly evil twin: the movement toward total pansexual license throughout
our culture. And concern for the effect on kids? Out the window.

Along with the heads of several other pro-family groups, I spent four
excruciating hours walking through the fair, documenting its horrors. One might
ask, why bother? Two reasons. Here in San Francisco, most no longer have a
problem with such outlandish behavior. These radical, misguided and lost people
need to be challenged out of their comfort with this depravity. Can any of them
be pulled from this fire?

But local officials seem entrenched in the endorsement of depravity. Mayor
Gavin Newsom issued a letter last week congratulating the Fair on its 25 year
anniversary. U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, third in line for the presidency,
represents San Francisco but she has yet to utter a word of criticism against
the Fair, even with its history of virulent anti-Christian blasphemy.


The folks in San Francisco are woefully out of touch with mainstream America.
Do you find whipping, being tied up (bondage) and master-slave role playing
just normal variations of sexual behavior? We didn’t think so. But we had a
chance to talk with the spokesperson for a national sado-masochism group, Susan
Wright, who believes conservatives are few and far between, greatly eclipsed by
a majority who accept these behaviors. She also thinks sado-masochism is an
inborn “sexual orientation,” worthy at some point of legal recognition. In
other words, some people are genetically wired to desire being whipped or
chained for sexual pleasure. Current sexual orientation policies could be
utilized to establish this new identity category, she believes.

What we witnessed at the Fair was almost beyond belief. Half or more of the
crowd consisted of homosexual men, some fully nude. The smell of marijuana was
everywhere. Masters and their ‘slaves’ strolled about. One man and woman were
wrapped in pythons. Many college age kids and young adults were present.

We witnessed at least one open sex act, and many more episodes of male-to- male
groping. Several vendor areas featured sado-masochistic acts. At one, they held
a ‘charity whipping.’ The Fair itself donates much of its revenue to charity,
which evidently excuses the perversion. Some goes to the Sisters of Perpetual
Indulgence, the twisted men-in-drag so infamous for mocking Christianity,
heterosexuality and the Catholic church. The ‘sisters’ collect the entrance fee
donations at the Fair gates. When I asked for an interview, one of them
declined when he learned I was with a conservative Christian group.





In an extended conversation with the ‘eighteen-year-old,’ I was told his
parents didn’t care what he did. He held a triple X-rated ‘gay’ porn DVD
evidently obtained at the Fair. Yet he was eager to talk to me, insisting he
did not want to be homosexual and had tried to stop since he was eleven. I
challenged him: then why are you here? Do you really want to stop? If so, don’t
come to events like this. He said he just couldn’t help himself. I gently urged
him to re-think his identity—that God had made him a guy, wonderfully able to
have a relationship with a girl. He nodded. ‘I know,’ he said.

Just at that moment, before we could continue, the youth’s ‘boyfriend’ began
screeching insults and obscenities at me. ‘You’re an *&##!’ He continued this
screeching rant, growing louder and more out of control, until finally, a
passer-by said, 'Oh, leave her alone!' We never continued the dialogue, because
the group of boys disappeared into the crowd.

We spoke with police twice, after noting their consistent failure to detain any
of the naked men strolling by. I asked a policeman why they didn’t do something
about the nudity. He told us that his supervisors had given instructions to
leave it alone. We got truly mixed signals about the legality of public nudity
and public sex acts. Liberty Counsel researched California law and found that
three California state laws (Sections 311.6, 313 and 314 of the California
Code) applied to public indecency, with jail time of up to six months. And
signs going into the Fair announced, ‘Nudity is Illegal.’ With so many openly
nude men, this was almost comical.


Among other vendors was the San Francisco Department of Health, with two huge
penises in their booth, presumably so their public health oversight could be
taken seriously. AIDS education groups were also present, using taxpayer funds
wisely. Also on hand was one of my personal favorite groups, PFLAG, Parents,
Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays. While we will not be able to show
them to you in a pro-family context, it was easy to photograph nude men posing
for cameras in front of the PFLAG booth. PFLAG is a consistent advocate of
homosexuality and gender change among teens and even children.


This de-humanization is actually regressive. There’s nothing new here: it’s
primitive tribalism and the sins of the Old Testament pagan nations
reincarnated, spiraling downward into barbarism. Only the sane and discerning
can save California and the rest of America from its debased exports.

Christ came to save people from drowning in their own excess, but in the City
by the Bay, drowning is not only apparently acceptable, it is eagerly pursued.
So sad.
Linda Harvey

No comments: